Google Cloud
FinOps Services for Google Cloud
We put a FinOps operating model in place on Google Cloud so engineering, finance and product share one view of spend, act on it every month and tie it to business value.
Make Google Cloud Spend Visible, Owned and Predictable
Cloud costs behave differently from data center budgets. Spend is variable, created by many engineers through many projects, and billed in fine-grained units such as vCPU hours, BigQuery slots, bytes scanned and model tokens. FinOps is the practice that brings financial accountability to that model. Following the FinOps Foundation framework of Inform, Optimize and Operate, it helps organizations understand where money goes, make informed trade-offs between speed, cost and quality, and continuously improve unit economics.
Hanoi Technology implements FinOps on Google Cloud using the platform’s own capabilities: Cloud Billing export to BigQuery, labels and tags, budgets and alerts, cost anomaly detection, FinOps hub, Recommender and Gemini Cloud Assist insights. We build the allocation model and dashboards, define the operating rhythm, and help your teams act on the findings. FinOps is a habit, so we design it to run without us when you are ready.
The Challenge
Why Google Cloud Costs Drift
Most organizations face the same structural issues when cloud usage grows.
Costs Cannot Be Allocated
Projects are shared, labels are inconsistent and shared services such as networking or GKE clusters are not split. Finance cannot charge back or show back, so no team feels responsible. Every cost review ends with arguments about whose spend it is.
Finance and Engineering Speak Different Languages
Finance sees invoices by SKU while engineers think in services and releases. Without a shared model connecting the two, budgets are set top-down and ignored in practice. Decisions about architecture rarely include cost.
Surprises Arrive at Month-End
A runaway BigQuery query, an autoscaling misconfiguration or a forgotten test environment can multiply daily spend. If alerts are not configured or routed to the right owner, the issue is found weeks later on the invoice.
Commitments Bought on Guesswork
Committed use discounts can deliver significant savings, but buying too much locks in waste while buying too little leaves money on the table. Teams without usage forecasts tend to avoid commitments entirely.
Business Value
Outcomes of a Mature FinOps Practice
Full Cost Transparency
Every dollar is attributed to a team, product, environment or customer, with shared costs split by agreed rules.
Unit Economics You Can Act On
Metrics such as cost per order, cost per active user or cost per model inference connect cloud spend to business growth.
Fewer Surprises
Budgets, forecasts and anomaly alerts surface unusual spend within a day and route it to the owner who can fix it.
Better Commitment Coverage
Data-driven committed use discount and BigQuery reservation planning increases discounted usage without overcommitting.
Engineers Who Design for Cost
Cost data in dashboards and pull requests makes efficiency a normal part of engineering decisions.
Accurate Budgets and Forecasts
Finance gets reliable forecasts built from real usage trends and planned initiatives, not last year’s invoice.
Cost Is an Engineering Metric
The most effective FinOps programs do not rely on a central team policing spend. They give each team clear data, clear ownership and simple guardrails, then make efficiency visible alongside reliability and speed. Our job is to build that system and help it stick.
Our Services
Hanoi Technology’s End-to-End FinOps on GCP Services
FinOps capabilities we implement on Google Cloud, from first visibility to continuous optimization.
FinOps Maturity Assessment
We review billing structure, resource hierarchy, labeling, tooling and governance against the FinOps Foundation capabilities, interview stakeholders and identify the quickest gains. You receive a scored maturity view and a prioritized roadmap.
- Maturity scorecard
- Quick-win list with estimates
- FinOps roadmap
Billing Data Foundation
We enable detailed Cloud Billing export to BigQuery, including pricing and resource-level data, and build curated cost tables aligned with the FOCUS specification. This becomes the single source for all cost reporting.
- Billing export configuration
- Curated cost data model
- Data refresh monitoring
Cost Allocation and Tagging
We design a label and tag taxonomy, enforce it through organization policies and Terraform modules, and define rules for splitting shared costs such as networking and GKE clusters.
- Tagging standard
- Enforcement policies
- Shared cost allocation rules
Dashboards and Unit Economics
We build Looker or Looker Studio dashboards for executives, finance and engineering, and combine cost with business metrics to calculate unit costs.
- Role-based cost dashboards
- Unit cost metrics
- Showback or chargeback reports
Budgets, Alerts and Anomaly Response
We configure budgets per team and project, connect anomaly detection and budget notifications to Pub/Sub, chat and ticketing, and write playbooks for responding.
- Budget and alert configuration
- Anomaly routing
- Response playbooks
FinOps Operating Model
We define roles, a monthly review cadence, KPIs and decision rights, and coach teams through the first cycles until the process runs on its own.
- RACI and governance charter
- Monthly review pack
- KPI targets
Our Approach
Our FinOps Implementation Path
Five steps that follow the Inform, Optimize and Operate lifecycle.
- 01
Baseline
We analyze twelve months of billing data, the resource hierarchy and current practices to establish where spend goes and how much is unallocated.
Deliverables: Spend baseline · Allocation gap analysis
- 02
Inform
We build the billing data model, labeling standard and dashboards so every team can see its own costs and trends.
Deliverables: Cost data model · Team dashboards
- 03
Optimize
We prioritize recommendations from FinOps hub, Recommender and our own analysis, then help teams implement them with measured savings.
Deliverables: Savings backlog · Realized savings tracker
- 04
Operate
We launch budgets, anomaly response, commitment planning and monthly reviews with clear owners and KPIs.
Deliverables: Governance cadence · Commitment plan
- 05
Automate and Hand Over
We automate policy enforcement and reporting, train your FinOps lead and teams, and continue as advisors if needed.
Deliverables: Automation scripts · Training and handover
Use Cases
FinOps Scenarios
Real-world situations where FinOps on GCP pays off.
SaaS Cost per Tenant
A SaaS company allocates GKE, Cloud SQL and BigQuery costs to individual customers, revealing which plans are unprofitable and informing pricing changes.
Controlling BigQuery Analytics Spend
A data team uses billing and INFORMATION_SCHEMA data to identify the most expensive queries and users, then introduces reservations and query guardrails.
AI Spend Visibility
A product team tracks Gemini model and Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform costs per feature, using cost per conversation as a unit metric before scaling a launch.
Chargeback for Business Units
A group with several subsidiaries introduces monthly chargeback based on labels and agreed shared-cost rules, replacing a single central IT budget.
Post-Migration Stabilization
After a data center exit, a company uses FinOps reviews to remove oversized VMs and idle disks inherited from the lift-and-shift.
Commitment Planning
Finance and engineering agree on a quarterly commitment review using usage forecasts, increasing discount coverage while keeping headroom for growth.
Technology
FinOps Tooling on Google Cloud
Native Google Cloud capabilities and open standards we use.
- Cloud Billing
- Billing Export to BigQuery
- FinOps hub
- Cost Anomaly Detection
- Budgets and Alerts
- Recommender
- Active Assist
- Gemini Cloud Assist
- Committed Use Discounts
- BigQuery Reservations
- Looker
- Looker Studio
- FOCUS Specification
- Organization Policy Service
- Terraform
- Pub/Sub
Platforms
Deliver FinOps on GCP on Your Preferred Platform
Why Hanoi Technology
Why Organizations Choose Hanoi Technology
Senior, Cross-Functional Teams
Strategy, data, AI, cloud and engineering specialists work as one team, so nothing is lost between hand-offs.
Proven Delivery
More than 50 projects delivered for clients in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
Radical Transparency
A written update every week and a demo of working software every sprint, so you always know where things stand.
Cost-Effective Global Delivery
Experienced engineers from our Hanoi delivery hub, with working-hour overlap for every major time zone.
Success Story · Logistics
Route optimization and fleet visibility for a regional logistics company
A regional delivery company handling thousands of shipments a day was planning routes and dispatching by hand. We built dynamic route optimization, a fleet dashboard and a driver app.
Read the Full StoryMore Success Stories
SaaS
75%of tickets fully automatedAI support assistant and smart escalation for a global SaaS company
A project-management SaaS provider receiving thousands of support requests a day needed faster answers without growing the support team. We built an AI assistant grounded in its knowledge base, with escalation to human agents.
Resources
Featured Resources
Industry trends and practical guidance to help you get more value from data, AI and technology.
FSMA 204 After the Delay: Using Shipment Monitoring to Get Traceability-Ready by 2028
The FDA Food Traceability Rule deadline moved to July 2028, but the data work is large. Here is how to use shipment monitoring and event data to get ready without wasting the extra time.
CSRD After the Omnibus: What the Revised ESRS Mean for Reporting From 2027
The Omnibus and the simplified ESRS reshaped EU sustainability reporting in 2026. Here is who is in scope, what changed in the standards and how to adapt your data and process.
OpenTelemetry in 2026: Building a Vendor-Neutral Observability Strategy
OpenTelemetry has become the default way to collect telemetry. Here is what changed in 2026 and a practical roadmap for a vendor-neutral observability stack.
Take Control of Your Google Cloud Spend
Start with a FinOps assessment that shows where your money goes and what to fix first. Book a free consultation and we will respond within 24 hours.
FinOps on GCP FAQ
What is the difference between FinOps and cost optimization?
Cost optimization is a set of actions, such as right-sizing, commitments or storage cleanup, that reduce the bill. FinOps is the operating model that makes those actions happen continuously: shared data, clear ownership, budgets, forecasts and a regular decision rhythm between finance, engineering and product. Without FinOps, savings from a one-off cleanup tend to erode within months as new workloads appear. We usually combine both, with FinOps making the savings stick.
How quickly will we see results?
Visibility improves within the first few weeks, once billing export, curated tables and dashboards are in place. Quick savings, such as removing idle resources or fixing expensive queries, often follow in the first month. Allocation accuracy, unit economics and cultural change take longer, typically one or two quarters of regular reviews. We report measured progress against the baseline at each monthly review so you can judge the value yourself.
Do we need a third-party FinOps tool?
Not necessarily. Google Cloud provides billing export, FinOps hub, budgets, anomaly detection, recommenders and Gemini Cloud Assist insights, and BigQuery plus Looker can cover most reporting needs. Third-party tools can help with multicloud consolidation, advanced allocation or Kubernetes cost splitting. We evaluate your needs and only recommend additional tools when they clearly save more effort than they cost.
How do you allocate shared costs like networking or GKE clusters?
We agree on allocation rules with finance and the teams involved, such as proportional to usage, fixed splits or based on business drivers. For GKE we enable cost allocation so namespace and label costs appear in billing data. Shared rules are implemented in the BigQuery cost model and documented, so the allocation is transparent and can be adjusted as the organization changes.
Who should own FinOps in our organization?
Typically a small central FinOps function, sometimes one person at first, coordinates the practice, while each engineering team owns its own costs. Finance provides budgets and forecasts, and leadership sets targets and decision rights. We help define these roles in a RACI, then coach the central lead and team representatives through the first review cycles so the model runs without external support.
Is FinOps relevant for AI and Gemini workloads?
Very much so. AI workloads introduce new cost drivers such as token usage, model choice, GPU and TPU capacity, and vector search. We add AI services to the allocation model, track unit metrics such as cost per conversation or per document processed, and help teams compare models and caching strategies on cost and quality. Google’s AI cost features in Cloud Billing help monitor spend on Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform (formerly Vertex AI) and the Gemini API.